Building an offshore platform is an extreme engineering challenge. The structure must survive relentless waves, corrosive saltwater, and immense loads for decades. Choosing the wrong steel combination can lead to catastrophic failure. I’ve supplied materials for projects in the North Sea and South China Sea, where the right steel mix was critical.
The best steel combination for offshore platforms uses high-strength, high-toughness grades for primary structures: S355NL/ML or API 2W/2H for jacket legs and nodes, combined with specialized offshore grades like S460ML for critical heavily loaded areas, and marine-grade stainless or duplex steel for splash zone cladding and fittings. This layered approach optimizes strength, fatigue life, and corrosion resistance across different environmental zones.

For offshore contractors, fabricators, and engineers, this isn’t about picking a single grade. It’s about assembling a material system. This guide will break down the key grades, compare common choices, and explain the logic behind the optimal combination for durability and safety. Let’s start with a common comparison in European specifications.
Is S275 better than S235?
In offshore and marine projects following European standards, you’ll see both S235 and S275 specified. "Better" depends on your design requirements. A fabricator in Romania was using S235 for all secondary structures, but switching some to S275 allowed them to reduce member sizes and save weight.
S275 is stronger than S2351, with a minimum yield strength of 275 MPa2 compared to S235’s 235 MPa. However, "better" is context-dependent. S275 is better where higher strength allows for weight or size reduction. S235 may be better for highly formable components or where its lower cost is prioritized over marginal strength gains. Both have similar weldability and toughness characteristics for general applications.

A Detailed Comparison for Offshore Applications
S235 and S275 are both non-alloy structural steels3 per EN 10025-2. The difference seems small, but it has design implications.
1. Mechanical Property Differences:
- Yield Strength (ReH): This is the key difference.
- S235: Minimum 235 MPa.
- S275: Minimum 275 MPa.
- Tensile Strength (Rm): S275 also has a higher tensile strength range.
- Ductility (Elongation): Both have good and similar ductility.
2. Chemical Composition:
S275 typically has slightly higher Carbon and Manganese content4 to achieve its higher strength. This can result in a marginally higher Carbon Equivalent (CE), which might require slightly more care during welding of thicker sections, but for most applications, weldability is still excellent.
3. Application in Offshore Structures:
Offshore platforms are weight-sensitive. Heavier structures require more steel for the jacket and more costly installation.
- For Secondary Structures: Platforms, walkways, non-critical bracing. Both S235 and S275 are suitable. Using S275 allows for slightly lighter sections.
- For Primary Structure: This is where the distinction matters less, because offshore primary steel typically requires much higher grades than S275—like S355 or higher, with enhanced toughness (NL/ML grades). S235 and S275 are generally not used for primary jacket legs or nodes.
Decision Matrix for Offshore Use:
| Application on Platform | Consider S235 if… | Consider S275 if… | Typical Offshore Choice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secondary Walkway grating supports | Cost is the absolute driver; loads are very light. | A slight reduction in member size is beneficial for weight or space. | Often S275 for a better strength-to-weight balance. |
| Enclosed cabin structures | Complex forming is required; maximum ductility is needed. | Not typically a deciding factor here. | S235 is common. |
| Primary Jacket Bracing | Not suitable. Requires higher strength and toughness. | Not suitable. Requires higher strength and toughness. | S355G8+M or similar. |
| Temporary Construction Aids | Yes, for cost savings. | Possibly, if reuse is planned and higher strength is useful. | Usually the most economical available grade. |
For rational project managers, the choice between S235 and S275 is a small optimization. The real focus is on the specialized grades that form the platform’s backbone, which leads to the next question.
What grade material is used for offshore structure?
Offshore structures demand the highest tier of structural steel. They are classified as "fatigue-sensitive" and "cold climate" structures simultaneously. The grades used are far beyond standard construction steel. I’ve worked on specifications where every plate for the splash zone required ultrasonic testing and strict through-thickness properties.
Primary offshore structures use high-strength, fine-grain normalized or thermomechanically rolled steels with guaranteed toughness at low temperatures. Common grades include EN 10225 grades (S355G8+N, S460G2+M), API 2W/2H Grades 50/60, and equivalent classification society grades (e.g., ABS EH36, DNV NV E36). These steels have strict chemistry control, excellent through-thickness properties (Z-quality), and are tested for Charpy impact at temperatures as low as -40°C or -60°C. They are designed for fatigue resistance and brittle fracture prevention.

The Rigorous Specifications of Offshore Steel
These materials are defined by standards created specifically for fixed offshore structures, such as EN 10225 and API 2W/2H.
1. Key Required Properties:
- High Strength: Yield strengths typically start at 355 MPa (S355) and go up to 500 MPa or more for special applications.
- Exceptional Low-Temperature Toughness: Design temperatures can be -20°C, -40°C, or even lower for Arctic platforms. Charpy V-notch impact values are mandated.
- Fatigue Resistance: The steel must withstand tens of millions of wave load cycles over 20-30 years. This requires clean steel with low sulfur and controlled microstructure.
- Through-Thickness Properties (Z-direction): Thick plates used at complex welded joints (nodes) are prone to lamellar tearing. Z-grade steel (e.g., S355G10+Z35) is tested to ensure strength perpendicular to the surface.
2. Understanding the Grade Designations (e.g., S355G8+N):
- S355: Minimum yield strength 355 MPa.
- G8: Denotes the material group and Charpy test temperature. G8 typically means testing at -40°C.
- +N: Delivery condition is normalized. +M is thermomechanically rolled. These processes refine the grain structure for toughness.
3. Application by Platform Zone:
- Jacket Legs and Heavy Braces: S355G8+M/N or S460G2+M. High strength and toughness for main members.
- Nodes (Joint Intersections): The most critical areas. Often use S355G10+Z35 or higher, with extra toughness and through-thickness guarantees.
- Splash Zone on Legs: This area may be clad with corrosion-resistant alloy (CRA) overlay (stainless or nickel alloy) or use thicker corrosion allowance steel.
- Deck Modules: Similar high-grade steels, but design may allow slightly less stringent grades for some internal members.
Common Offshore Grade Selection Table:
| Platform Component & Challenge | Typical Steel Grade(s) | Key Property Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Jacket Legs (Main Columns) | EN S355G8+M/N, API 2H Grade 50 | High strength, toughness at -40°C, fatigue resistance. |
| Node Connections | EN S355G10+Z35, S460G2+Z35 | All of the above, plus guaranteed through-thickness strength to prevent lamellar tearing. |
| Boat Landing & J-Tubes | S355G8+M or Stainless Clad Plate | Impact resistance from vessels, plus corrosion resistance. |
| Deck Support Frame | S355G7+M/N (Test at -20°C) | High strength, good toughness for the topsides environment. |
| Helideck Structure | S355J2+N or similar | Strength with good toughness; weight is a consideration. |
A supplier for offshore projects must provide these specific grades with full traceability and often additional testing reports (NDT, CTOD). This steel is part of a broader material palette used in offshore construction.
What materials are used for offshore structures?
While steel is the king, a modern offshore platform is a composite of different materials, each chosen for a specific job in a specific zone. It’s a material science puzzle. A project in Qatar used five distinct material systems on a single platform leg to manage different threats.
Offshore structures primarily use high-toughness carbon steel plates and sections for the primary jacket and deck. Additional key materials include concrete (for gravity-based structures and grouting), stainless steel and duplex alloys for critical piping and cladding, aluminum for superstructures (to reduce weight), specialized coatings (epoxy, zinc), and sacrificial anodes (zinc/aluminum) for cathodic protection. This multi-material approach tackles strength, corrosion, and weight.

A Systems Approach to Material Selection
Each material addresses a specific failure mode or environmental attack.
1. Structural Materials:
- Carbon & Low-Alloy Steel (as discussed): The load-bearing skeleton. Constitutes ~80-90% of the weight.
- Reinforced Concrete: Used in:
- Gravity-Based Structures (GBS): As the massive base.
- Grout: To fill the annulus between jacket legs and pile sleeves, transferring loads.
- Topsides Modules: For firewalls and blast walls.
2. Corrosion Protection Materials:
Corrosion is the single biggest threat to longevity.
- Coatings: Multi-layer epoxy/polyurethane paint systems are the first line of defense for atmospheric and splash zones.
- Sacrificial Anodes: Blocks of Zinc or Aluminum alloy attached to submerged steel. They corrode instead of the structure.
- Corrosion-Resistant Alloys (CRA):
- Stainless Steel (316, 6Mo): For piping, valves, fasteners in corrosive areas.
- Duplex Stainless Steel (2205, 2507): Higher strength and corrosion resistance than 316; used for sea water lift pipes, firewater systems.
- Cladding: A thin layer of CRA (e.g., Inconel 625) welded over carbon steel at critical splash zones or flowlines.
3. Weight-Saving and Specialized Materials:
- Aluminum Alloys (5083, 6082): For helidecks, living quarters walls, and parts of the superstructure. Reduces weight high up, improving stability.
- Composites (GRP): For non-critical piping, cable trays, and gratings where light weight and corrosion resistance are needed.
Material System by Environmental Zone:
| Platform Zone | Primary Threats | Material System Used |
|---|---|---|
| Atmospheric Zone (Deck) | General corrosion, fatigue. | Painted High-Strength Steel (S355). Aluminum for housing. |
| Splash & Tidal Zone | Extreme corrosion (wet/dry cycles), abrasion, impact. | Thick steel with corrosion allowance + High-performance coating + possibly CRA cladding. |
| Submerged Zone | Corrosion, marine growth. | Painted High-Strength Steel + Sacrificial Anode System. |
| Mudline Zone | Corrosion, soil stress. | Steel with coating + Anodes + sometimes concrete weight coating. |
| Process/Piping Systems | Internal corrosion from fluids. | Carbon steel, CRA (Duplex SS), or internally clad pipe. |
For an EPC contractor, procuring this material ecosystem is complex. A supplier who can provide not just the primary steel but also advise on or source the complementary materials adds tremendous value. Within this system, the quest for the "best" steel for the marine environment remains central.
What is the best steel for the marine environment?
There is no universal "best" steel. The best choice is the steel that most effectively solves the specific problems of its location within the marine environment. Using splash-zone steel for the entire structure would be astronomically expensive and unnecessary.
For the general marine structural environment (atmospheric to submerged), the best steels are high-strength, low-alloy (HSLA) grades1 with certified toughness, such as ABS AH36/DH36 or EN S355G7+M. For extreme corrosion resistance where strength is secondary, austenitic stainless steel 3162 or duplex stainless steels are best. The "best" is always a balance of required strength, toughness, corrosion resistance, fabricability, and total lifecycle cost. Material selection is zoned.

Zoning the Environment for Optimal Steel Selection
The marine environment is not monolithic. We break it into zones and match the steel to the dominant threat.
1. The Atmospheric Zone (Above Splash):
- Threat: Salt-laden air, UV, general corrosion.
- Best Steel: Painted high-strength carbon steel. Grades like S355J2+N or AH36 are excellent. The steel provides strength; the paint system provides corrosion protection. Cost-effective and strong.
2. The Splash & Tidal Zone (Most Aggressive):
- Threat: Constant wet/dry cycles, high oxygen, abrasion from waves/sand.
- Best Steel Strategy: This is the hardest zone. Options include:
- Carbon Steel with Massive Corrosion Allowance: Use thicker steel and plan for loss.
- Special Coatings: Thick, elastomeric coatings.
- Corrosion-Resistant Alloy (CRA) Cladding: Weld a layer of stainless steel (e.g., 316L) or nickel alloy onto carbon steel. This is often the "best" technical solution for critical areas, though costly.
- Duplex Stainless Steel3: For small, critical components.
3. The Submerged Zone:
- Threat: Corrosion (slower than splash zone), marine growth.
- Best Steel: High-strength carbon steel (e.g., DH36) with Cathodic Protection (CP)4. The steel provides strength; a system of sacrificial anodes (zinc/aluminum) protects it from corrosion. This is the most economical and reliable system for large submerged structures.
4. The Internal/Cargo Zone:
- Threat: Corrosive fluids (oil, gas, produced water).
- Best Steel: Depends on fluid. May be carbon steel, internally coated carbon steel, or CRA (Duplex 2205, 2507).
"Best" Steel Selection Matrix:
| Application & Environment | "Best" Steel Type | Why It’s the Best Fit |
|---|---|---|
| Offshore Jacket Leg (Submerged) | S355G8+M/N or API 2H Grade 50 | Provides the required strength, fatigue life, and toughness at low temperature. Corrosion is managed by CP. |
| Ship Hull (Immersed) | ABS AH36/DH36 | Certified strength and toughness; weight-saving is crucial. Protected by coatings + CP. |
| Desalination Plant Pipework | Duplex Stainless Steel3 (2205) | Excellent strength and superior corrosion resistance to chloride pitting and stress cracking. |
| Deck Handrail (Exposed) | Stainless Steel 316 | Corrosion resistance is the primary need; strength requirement is low. Provides maintenance-free service. |
| Port Piling (Splash Zone) | Heavy-wall carbon steel (S355) with CRA overlay | Combines the strength and cost of carbon steel with the corrosion resistance of stainless at the critical waterline. |
For a results-driven offshore project, the "best" steel combination is the one that delivers the required 25+ year service life with the lowest total cost of ownership5. This means using cost-effective, tough carbon steel for 95% of the structure and investing strategically in premium materials like duplex cladding only where the environment demands it. This holistic, zoned approach is the hallmark of smart offshore engineering.
Conclusion
The best steel combination for offshore platforms layers materials: high-toughness S355/S460 grades for primary strength, specialized cladding or alloys for the corrosive splash zone, and protective systems (coatings, anodes) throughout. This zoned, systems-based approach ensures maximum durability, safety, and cost-effectiveness in the harshest marine environments.
-
Understanding HSLA grades can help you choose the right steel for marine applications, ensuring durability and cost-effectiveness. ↩ ↩
-
Explore the advantages of using stainless steel 316 for corrosion resistance in marine environments. ↩ ↩
-
Discover the unique properties of Duplex Stainless Steel that make it ideal for marine environments. ↩ ↩ ↩
-
Learn how CP can extend the life of submerged steel structures by preventing corrosion. ↩ ↩
-
Learn how to assess the long-term costs associated with different steel options for marine projects. ↩